Blog

  • Cultivating Leadership at All Levels

    Cultivating Leadership at All Levels

    Perhaps you’ve already heard the difference between managing and leading. If not, the Harvard Business Review notes:

    Management consists of controlling a group or a set of entities to accomplish a goal. Leadership refers to an individual’s ability to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward organizational success. 

    There is no mention of where in the hierarchy of an organization a leader emerges, so why do we usually think that a leader needs to be in a role on the top steps of the hierarchy? Schools are organizations with many examples of leaders at lower levels of the hierarchy, like teachers and staff, that demonstrate leadership. I think when we discuss who is a leader, we should consider their ability to influence, motivate, and enable others, as mentioned above. However, due to the normalization of leadership = higher position, many teacher leaders don’t view themselves that way or minimize their ability to rise to positions on the hierarchy of leadership. In this case, those in positions of leadership have a responsibility to take note of and mentor staff who don’t see themselves as leaders or have leadership potential. How can leaders already in positions of power on the hierarchy support those who have the potential but either don’t perceive themselves as having the skills or are fearful of taking on a leadership role or even leading a specific project?

    When I was the elementary principal at a private, all-female American curriculum school in Kuwait, my team included teachers from all over the globe and had a variety of degrees from a variety of universities.  It was my responsibility to manage the day-to-day routines as well as to guide change and improvement in teaching and learning. There was no way I could do all that if I didn’t delegate some of my responsibilities to teachers and para-professionals who would benefit from the experience of taking a leadership role in some tasks. Some of the women I tapped on the shoulder asked me how I knew they would be able to lead a task or project. I told them I had observed them in their teaching role and also how they handled their students and worked with their team members. Some were fearful of failure if they led the task and politely told me they were not ready. I respected their decision even if I didn’t agree. Many who took up my challenge applied for positions as head of a department or as vice-principal. Para-professionals I mentored returned to complete their undergraduate degrees or complete a teacher certification and then applied for teaching positions. 

    So, what key traits did I notice in my team members that showed me they had leadership potential? 

    Here are my top 5:

    They are…

    1. Self-motivated 
    2. Long-term thinkers who don’t fear change
    3. Relationship-builders and team players
    4. Empathetic and Compassionate 
    5. Decisive after listening to and considering alternatives

    Self-motivation is key to leading. You can’t wait for someone else to come up with an idea or push you forward. You need to wake up in the morning ready for action and be organized enough to make things happen.

    Being a forward-thinker means seeing into the future while being grounded in the present and understanding the past. It also means you are able to plan short-term to reach a long-term goal. And finally, it means you aren’t afraid of change because you are planning for it. 

    Building healthy professional relationships is also key to effective leadership. Leading isn’t a solo endeavor. It’s a team effort. Little can be accomplished if you don’t have a supportive team around you but building a team takes the right kind of person. It needs a combination of skills such as communication, collaboration, trust, respect, and valuing the potential of human capacity. 

    Empathy and compassion are often used interchangeably; however, empathy is important for making connections with others so they feel valued and compassion helps them feel validated.  Empathy means you understand their feelings and compassion means you’re ready to step up and do something to help them resolve a problem. 

    Decision-making is an art and a science. The art is knowing when the science you have is enough to make a decision. In simpler terms, gathering all the information and data, delegating tasks to your team members, receiving feedback from your team, then making an informed decision are the art and science of decision-making.

    School leaders have a responsibility to cultivate and mentor other school leaders, especially if they want sustainability in programs and systems. I’ve found that the best place to start is with our teachers and staff. 

    Want to Learn More?

    The Essential Handbook for Highly Effective School Leaders: How school leaders maximize teacher commitment, engagement, performance, and retention by Tim Nolan.

    Leaders in Succession: Rotation in International School Administration by Patrick Lee

    Posted by: Ilene Winokur, EdD

    Dr. Ilene Winokur has lived in Kuwait since 1984 and is a professional development specialist supporting teachers globally, including refugee teachers. Ilene has been active in learning innovation for over 25 years and is passionate about narratives related to belonging. Before retiring in 2019, she was a teacher and administrator at the primary and pre-college levels. Her work has focused on supporting multilingual learners and increasing their success in English-based curricula. As a teacher, she earned her teaching certification in ESL to increase her toolbox of strategies to ensure her students felt included, valued, and seen. As a school leader, Ilene mentored her team members about techniques such as scaffolding and tiered questioning that support language acquisition. Ilene advocates for instilling a sense of belonging in students, which is the subject of her books Journey to Belonging: Pathways to Well-Being and Finding Your Pathway to Belonging in Education.

  • Wisconsin could use concealed carry fees to help fund school safety office

    District Administration Read More

    Bipartisan bills would use funding from concealed carry licenses to keep up staffing within Wisconsin’s Office of School Safety.

    Wisconsin created the school safety office in 2018 in the aftermath of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.

    Today, the office oversees regional teams that respond to crises. It also gives out grants and training so districts can improve security, and staffs a 24/7 hotline to field tips about threats, bullying and mental health crises.

    Read more from Wisconsin Public Radio.

    The post Wisconsin could use concealed carry fees to help fund school safety office appeared first on District Administration.

     

  • Emergency planning: 9 tough questions you need to answer

    District Administration Read More

    As we head deeper into 2024, fears concerning school safety are running exceptionally high among parents. According to a poll of parents taken at the start of the school year, 38% say they fear for their child’s safety at school. Although this is lower than the 44% of parents who said the same immediately following last year’s Uvalde school shooting, it is still the highest level of concern reported since Columbine, more than two decades ago.

    School leaders and district administrators are on the front lines of keeping students and staff safe, and as we have seen far too often, tragedy can strike anywhere. Leaders are therefore tasked not only with preparing for the unthinkable—they must also be ready to address parents’ fears and answer their valid questions regarding emergency preparedness planning.

    9 questions you need to answer

    Parents are turning to leaders for information regarding school response plans for active violence. But you should also have answers ready regarding emergency responses to extreme weather events, fires, police activity, and more. And it should go without saying that those answers must reflect actual plans in place.

    Here are the tough questions that parents want answered :

    1. What are your emergency plans for different scenarios? Since sharing response details is viewed by experts as bad practice, you should not reveal specific plan measures. But you do have the responsibility to let parents know that plans exist, that they are regularly reviewed and updated, and that security experts have signed off on them.

    2. What type of emergency training does your staff receive? You should be able to say that the school is prepared for all types of emergencies and that all staff members are regularly trained in these measures.

    3. What is your schedule of drills? The scheduling of drills is something you should share with parents. They can then help reinforce learnings with their children and continue safety conversations outside of school. They can also help to reduce any anxieties around the drills.

    4. How are before- and after-school activities addressed? As children spend more time on campus for sports, extracurriculars, and events, you should be able to tell parents that your security plans and procedures cover off-hours activities.

    Listen to DA : ‘Talking Out of School’ podcast launches with our first guest, Randi Weingarten

    5. Where should I plan to reconnect with my children if the school is evacuated? It is essential to include evacuation procedures in all information packets for parents, including where reunification will occur.

    6. How do I securely access the school? Again, this is information that every parent should receive. Security-informed parents will respect that schools require robust security procedures to govern access to facilities.

    7. How will the school alert parents in case of an emergency? Make sure to explain how you plan to manage notifications in an emergency. Parents may want to opt-in to alerts if the school offers different tiers of alert urgency.

    8. What information will you provide to students around safety? Information about emergency procedures can be confusing and upsetting to students, especially younger ones, and parents often want to discuss these issues at home. Consider what you will share with students and make sure parents know what is available and when it is given to their children.

    9. How is personal information handled? Data security is a critical aspect of the broader security conversation. Be ready to explain what personal information is stored, where it is stored, and how it is used.

    Parents today have legitimate questions about their children’s safety at school. We must provide them with clear, accurate and reliable answers. In doing so, we demonstrate our ability to meet our greatest responsibility as school administrators and leaders — to protect the safety of those entrusted to our care.

    The post Emergency planning: 9 tough questions you need to answer appeared first on District Administration.

     

  • Philadelphia hopes year-round schooling can catch kids up to grade level – will it make a difference?

    Education – The Conversation Read More

    Year-round schooling can assist low-income parents in need of child care. kali9/E+ Collection via Getty Images

    Upon becoming mayor of Philadelphia, Cherelle Parker announced that she will establish a working group on full-day and year-round schooling – an idea she had supported while campaigning. The group will develop a strategy to keep Philadelphia public schools open for longer hours during the week, from 7:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., as well as over the summer, and to provide “meaningful, instructive out-of-school programming and job opportunities for students.”

    Below, education expert Daniel H. Robinson answers five questions about year-round schooling in Philadelphia.

    What do we know about the mayor’s plan?

    Parker is proposing to keep Philadelphia public school buildings open longer hours and more days throughout the year. According to Superintendent Tony Watlington’s Accelerate Philly strategic plan, a year-round and extended-day school calendar will be piloted in up to 10 schools, with the goal of increasing student academic achievement. It does not state how many days or hours will be added to the 180 days Philadelphia currently requires.

    This is different from what’s commonly known as year-round schooling, which doesn’t add extra school days but simply moves the existing days around so that there are multiple short breaks instead of a long summer break. For example, students might have 45 school days followed by 15 days of break, or 60 school days followed by 20 days of break.

    The Philadelphia school district plan aligns with a recommendation made over 40 years ago, in 1983, in the Nation at Risk report commissioned by the Department of Education. The report suggested that the school year should be increased to 200 to 220 days.

    How prevalent is year-round schooling?

    The length of the school day and year varies around the world. Japan and Australia have school for almost the entire year, while the U.S. has school for only about nine months. In contrast, countries like Finland, Iceland and Ireland have shorter school days and years than the U.S. France has a longer school year but similar total hours per year as the U.S. French students get a two-hour lunch and do not attend school on Wednesdays.

    In Philadelphia, some charter schools have added a summer extension program. But they still maintain traditional school hours during the school year.

    Several states are participating in an initiative this year called the Time Collaborative. This three-year initiative involves 40 schools that will add 300 hours to their existing school calendar by having either longer days, longer school years or both.

    Can the mayor legally do this?

    The current minimum number of days that Pennsylvania schools are required to be open is 180 – similar to most other states. Districts can decide when they start and finish. The Philadelphia mayor can certainly extend the school day and the school hours since she appoints the school board members, who in turn control who is hired or fired as superintendent. And, most importantly, the new superintendent is supportive of the mayor’s plan.

    A more important question is: Should the mayor do this?

    Parker has said that she wants to catch kids up academically to grade level. Only about 15% of fourth graders in Philadelphia public schools score at or above the proficient level on standardized reading tests, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.

    But what are the additional costs? In addition to possible increased student and teacher fatigue and stress, the main cost is money. Keeping schools open and staffed longer requires more dollars.

    Despite the hope that longer school days or years will lead to gains in student achievement, there’s little evidence that they will.

    If Philly does in fact adopt a longer school day or year, even with just 10 schools on a voluntary basis, it could prove difficult to evaluate the effects.

    Foremost among these challenges is selection bias. Schools that have support to opt in are likely different from schools that do not.

    A better evaluation plan would be to first solicit applications for the pilot program from the more than 200 Philadelphia schools. Then, from those schools who volunteer to participate, randomly choose 10 for the pilot and then, at the end of the school year, measure the outcomes and compare them to the schools that weren’t chosen.

    What are the potential gains?

    The Accelerate Philly plan cites a 2023 study, which suggests that “summer and after-school programming can be effective in accelerating learning.”

    Adding additional hours for before-school and after-school enrichment, and for more days during the school year, supports parents by providing free and convenient child care. It makes it easier for them to drop off and pick up kids on their way to and from work.

    It also provides kids a safe and supportive environment for more hours. Keeping kids at school longer during the day and for more days during the year can lower juvenile crime. More time in school can mean less time on the streets.

    There is still no decision on whether student participation will be mandatory. If it is not, some kids who might benefit may not get their parents’ consent to go to school earlier, stay longer and go for more days over the summer.

    What hurdles might year-round schooling face in Philly?

    Funding will be a big hurdle. Keeping school buildings open longer requires more energy. Many Philly public schools do not have adequate air conditioning to be open throughout the hot summer months.

    More importantly, this plan requires more personnel – particularly teachers who can stay more hours. A January 2024 report from Penn State University’s Center for Evaluation and Education Policy Analysis found that Philadelphia teachers are leaving the profession at “relatively high attrition rates” – considerably higher than the rest of Pennsylvania. More Philadelphia teachers are quitting or retiring than those who are being newly trained, according to the report.

    It is not clear yet how the teachers union would react to year-round schooling throughout the district or how all the additional hours and programming would fit into the annual operating budget.

    Daniel H. Robinson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

  • Why the Rush toward Generative AI Literacy in K-12 Schools May Be Premature

    The 74 Read More

    The emergence of generative artificial intelligence is driving a movement to rapidly embed genAI literacy — the understanding and skills required to responsibly and effectively utilize these technologies — into the fabric of K-12 education. While this work is well-intentioned, aiming to prepare children for a tech-centric future, the challenge lies in discerning the appropriate timing, speed and manner of integrating genAI literacy, and ultimately, the technology itself into K-12.

    One reason widespread genAI literacy in K-12 may be premature is the technology’s current state. The breakneck pace of development, coupled with underlying complexities and unknowns, makes it exceptionally challenging to provide evidence-based education. For instance, how genAI makes decisions remains a mystery, even to its creators. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, a leader in the field, recently suggested that genAI is “inherently unpredictable.” What’s more, the technology’s rapid advancement vastly exceeds the more measured pace of curriculum development and associated professional development necessary for high-quality instruction. This imbalance could put schools and districts at risk of constantly having to play catch-up with the skills and understanding needed to teach students how to use genAI responsibly, rather than concentrating on equipping them with a fundamental and lasting base of knowledge.

    Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

    Second, an urgent push to incorporate genAI literacy in classrooms might lead to a low quality of tools, content and teaching as companies prioritize quickly getting their products to market over ensuring the rigor and educational integrity of their offerings.

    Related

    Iowa Professors Say Students Must Be Educated About Artificial Intelligence

    Third, genAI literacy — even if focused on responsible adoption — implicitly suggests that the technology is safe for children. Putting aside doomsday hypotheticals — in a recent poll, 50% of genAI researchers said they believe there is a 10% or greater chance that humans will go extinct from our inability to control the technology — existing problems, such as false information and misinformation, deep fakes, bias and phishing, highlight the fact that none of the current major genAI models, including ChatGPT, Claude, Bard and Co-Pilot, are being built specifically with kids’ safety in mind. 

    Finally, the push for widespread genAI literacy may detract from more pressing priorities. These include, somewhat ironically, systematic preparation for the adoption of genAI to minimize future risks, as well as investments in fundamental subjects like literacy, mathematics, arts and physical education. It might also drain crucial resources supporting students’ social, emotional and mental well-being, which will be especially critical to preserve amid looming budget challenges.

    Related

    7 Artificial Intelligence Trends That Could Reshape Education in 2024

    Still, while acknowledging these concerns, it’s also crucial to recognize the potential of genAI. Given its saturation in the public consciousness, completely dismissing genAI literacy would be naive. Responsibly integrating genAI literacy and adopting the technology in K-12 education is the obligation of all stakeholders: parents, teachers, administrators, philanthropists and policymakers. Here are five considerations:

    K-12 stakeholders should approach rapid classroom-based genAI adoption with deep skepticism : Recognize the potential of genAI but approach its integration into schools with caution. Decades of ed tech underperformance suggest that the notion of “adopt or get left behind” may be misleading. Taking a skeptical stance toward genAI could help identify areas where the technology can benefit students and isolate potential risks, thus fostering a deliberate and principled approach to incorporating genAI literacy in classrooms.

    Schools should offer genAI literacy to high school students only: Incorporate genAI literacy into regular academic classes rather than free-standing lessons, with a specific focus on its safe use, ethical considerations and development of the skills necessary to evaluate the technology’s effectiveness at real-world problem solving and task completion. The cognitive maturity of students in grades 9 to 12 will allow for a deeper and more nuanced understanding of complex concepts such as ethics and safety in the context of rapidly evolving AI technologies, which younger students — while adaptable and tech-savvy — may not yet possess. Developing appropriate teaching tools for younger students and training educators accordingly will take time.

    Schools should continue to focus on timeless skills : The shape of future job markets impacted by genAI is largely unknowable — remember predictions about the inevitable death of blue-collar jobs from artificial intelligence? So it is prudent to continue focusing on skills essential in a world where the only predictable constant is change: critical thinking, problem-solving, adaptability and ethical reasoning, as well as newer areas such as computational thinking.

    Philanthropy should focus on understanding and mitigating risks associated with genAI adoption: Funding should prioritize concerns about safety, privacy and well-being. Answering fundamental questions that can make genAI literacy more robust and rigorous should be the current focus. For instance, how will technology impact children’s sense of self? How will it impact cognition in young people? What systems must be built and data collected to determine the appropriate age to introduce classroom-based genAI tools?

    Philanthropy and policymakers must empower adults : One clear lesson from the social media experiment over the last decade is that adults must protect young people from the risks associated with new technologies. To do so, they need to understand those risks with nuance. GenAI literacy should be offered to educators, parent-teacher associations and professional organizations, among others, to equip adults with the knowledge necessary to safeguard young people and advocate on their behalf. 

    The sensible way forward is to focus on a balanced approach that prepares children for the future without overwhelming or misdirecting their learning experiences in the classroom.

    Related

    AI & Education: A Classroom Perspective on Looming Possibilities and Challenges

     

  • 6 years after Parkland shooting, school librarian works hard to make her space the safest

    District Administration Read More

    Six years since the day everything changed, the library at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School brims with resources to promote mental health. There’s a “Zen den” for resting and decompressing, a therapy dog named River, yoga equipment, a button-making station and smartboards that display videos of crochet lessons.

    Librarian Diana Haneski, River’s owner, puts a lot of thought into what to include in – and exclude from – the library’s collections. She opted to remove a Civil War-themed book with a rifle on its cover, for example, and to avoid other materials with imagery that could be upsetting. And she’s made sure to include a range of literature that offers students an escape from daily life, including sci-fi novels and youth-oriented magazines.

    Haneski, 63, winner of this year’s national “I Love My Librarian” award for her public service, sees such escapism and mental support as essential for herself and her students.

    Read more from USA Today.

    The post 6 years after Parkland shooting, school librarian works hard to make her space the safest appeared first on District Administration.

     

  • Tennessee proposal would require schools to craft own AI policies

    K-12 Dive – Latest News Read More

    If the legislation is adopted, schools and colleges would need to develop artificial intelligence use policies for the 2024-25 school year by July 1.

     

  • Low-income schools aren’t vetting ed tech, analysis finds

    K-12 Dive – Latest News Read More

    Higher rates of ads on school websites and lower access to devices paint a “disturbing picture” for these schools, says a tech safety organization.

     

  • Pennsylvania moves to expand education funding statewide

    k-12 education – Yahoo Search Results Read More

    Looking to tackle inequitable education funding across the state, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro has…

    (Feed generated with FetchRSS) 

  • Should Parents Ever Be Held Responsible for the Harmful Actions of Their Children?

    NYT > The Learning Network Read More

    ​A jury convicted a mother for a mass shooting carried out by her child. Is this an important precedent or a dangerous one?